AIS Traffic Analysis for the Calibration of Risk Assessment Methods Brian Calder and Kurt Schwehr Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping and NOAA/UNH Joint Hydrographic Center Chase Ocean Engineering Lab, 24 Colovos Road, Durham NH 03820, USA. Abstract Assessing the risk to a vessel of transiting or anchoring in a given area is a fundamental task for the user of hydrographic data. A sufficiently nuanced analysis of risk is also one way to present, to the user, the degree of uncertainty in the data being presented, providing a much better means to analyze and understand the completeness, accuracy and validity of the navigational product for an individual than current methods such as source or reliability diagrams, or equivalents in electronic products. Plausible methods for expressing the risk to a vessel in any given area requires more information that can be provided from the hydrographic databases typically held by Hydrographic Offices. In particular, much of the assessment of risk revolves around the behaviors of the vessel or, if the assessment is intended to describe the mean behavior within a geographic area (such as a harbor or approach), the aggregate behavior of all of the traffic in the area. Other issues such as preferred transit lanes, traffic control measures and local climatic conditions are also important. Unfortunately, this vital information is typically either poorly understood or unavailable. We consider the potential for harvesting and aggregating Automatic Identification System (AIS) messages within a geographic area as a means of characterizing the traffic in the area and its behaviors. Regular AIS messages include such information as the physical dimensions of the ship, its draft, speed, heading with respect to course, etc., and analysis of this data as a function of time can illuminate more complex behaviors of the traffic such as preferred routes, speed distributions, or simply mix of shipping types. Through analysis of the AIS traffic for a period of two months at three ports (Hampton Roads, VA; Houston-Galveston, TX; and San Francisco-Oakland, CA) we investigate the problems in verifying and translating the raw AIS messages transmitted in practice from transiting ships, and how these may be reduced to statistical distributions appropriate for calibration of risk assessment models. We consider in particular the distribution of shipping and the presence of Class B transceivers, which are currently being phased in within the US. We outline the time-series analysis methods used to reduce the data to appropriate statistical models, and the implications this has for risk assessment models and port management in the geographical area.